Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cindi's avatar

👏🏻Kudos to you👏🏻! I have serious doubts we can ever change the “true believers” who, as you so correctly pointed out, have the best time of their lives being “important”, virtue signaling, shaming, & otherwise following the herd in bovine compliance whether it’s WuFlu or climate change.

I think my response to the “settled science” of “climate change” would be - duh, of course the climate changes...minute to minute, hour to hour, day to day, week by week & so forth.

Ask those dopes if they’ve ever watched a weatherman or weather app change from an 80% chance of rain to 10% in the space if 20 minutes & then ask, if they can’t get THAT right, how do you reckon they KNOW about that dastardly 1 degree of “warming” 1, 10, 20 or 50 years from now & who gives a flying f^*k about it anyway?!?!?

Expand full comment
Brian Halliday's avatar

Emotion > Belief >Conviction. Thats how programming works. Be subjected to data that elicits a strong emotion long enough it becomes a belief. Once that is installed your unconscious mind seeks information to back up the data. At the same time filtering out anything that opposes it. If the emotion is triggered long enough it becomes stronger and the belief moves on to a conviction. Which is like a belief in a sand box. Nothing can get in to engage with it. Also there is the nature of duality to be aware of. "truthers" are the other side of the spectrum. And a non mirror image of the maskers. Instead of an apocalypse they fear a dystopia at both extreme ends. Its the Universe expressing it's energy feeding off conflict clashing the opposing ends together in order to bring back balance. Emotion> Belief>Conviction exist on both sides. The best way is to become an observer instead of a participant.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts